ACSM Blog
Menu

In This Section:

  • Industry Presented Blog | Fuels of Engagement: Myth Busting and Science Trusting Webinar Q&A

    by David Barr | Jan 10, 2019

    Mythbusting ACSM NDC

    Viewpoints presented in this blog reflect opinions of the author and National Dairy Council and do not necessarily reflect positions or policies of ACSM.

    National Dairy Council

    National Dairy Council recently hosted an industry-presented webinar entitled: Fuels of Engagement: Myth Busting and Science Trusting. Watch a free recorded version of the webinar. The webinar is also available for two (2) CEC’s via ACSM ceOnline.

    Several questions were asked by attendees during the webinar and the answers are below.

    Q 1: Why do we drink cow’s milk?

    For several reasons. Here’s some food for thought:

    • We’ve enjoyed drinking cow’s milk for centuries: Archaeologists and anthropologists have found evidence of people drinking cow’s milk dating back several thousand years, according to “Dr. Dairy,” Greg Miller, PhD, FACN, who recently wrote about this topic.
    • It’s not just about taste: While milk tastes great, it’s also good for us – it packs a nutrient punch,plus it’s affordable, readily available and versatile. Plus, Milk is the leading food source of 3 of the 4 nutrients of public health concern for children[1] and adults[2] (calcium, potassium[3] and vitamin D) in the American diet.
    • We’re not only enjoying cow's milk, but other dairy foods, too: Thanks to milk, we also can enjoy other dairy foods from cheese to yogurt. Dairy offers many delicious ways to get essential nutrients into our day-to-day diet (or meals) from enjoying a yogurt for breakfast to noshing on a grilled cheese sandwich for dinner. 

     

    Q 2: What is Lactose Intolerance? Does it mean I should avoid dairy?

    Lactose is the natural sugar found in milk and many other dairy foods made from milk, like yogurt and cheese. The body makes a natural enzyme called lactase to help digest lactose. If your body doesn’t make enough lactase, you may not be able to digest lactose properly (called lactose intolerance). Lactose intolerance is characterized by several symptoms, which could include abdominal pain, bloating, gas and/or diarrhea, that may happen after some people eat or drink dairy. It’s important to make sure your symptoms are not from another problem with the help of your doctor.

    Lactose intolerance is a very individual condition, which means people can tolerate different amounts of lactose. Many people often don’t have to miss out on the great taste and health benefits of low-fat and fat-free dairy foods, because there are many options available with varying amounts of lactose, even lactose-free. Some milk companies make lactose-free milk, which is easier to digest. The process to make it starts with real cow’s milk. Then the lactose is broken down into its two simple sugars. This makes it easier to digest for those who may not have enough lactase in their systems. Other milk companies may choose to filter out the lactose. Lactose-free milk provides the same essential nutrients, such as calcium, protein, vitamin D and B vitamins, as regular milk and can be used in the same delicious ways. 

    In addition to lactose-free milk, many with lactose intolerance can work small amounts of dairy into daily meals or choose dairy foods with minimal lactose. Here are 12 tips you can try to see what works for you so you may not have to give up your favorite dairy foods and the great taste and health benefits that come with them.

     

    Q 3: Can dairy foods increase my risk of cancer? 

    Most of us have had an experience with cancer either personally or through family, friends or coworkers. It can be scary and confusing, so it’s understandable people are searching for ways to reduce their risk, which may include watching the foods they eat. When it comes to dairy foods and the risk of a complex disease like cancer, according to a comprehensive review, the evidence is not conclusive.[4] But “the proven health benefits of dairy foods greatly outweigh the unproven harm.”   

    Because each cancer is different, it can be difficult to establish dietary recommendations. Rather than focusing on removing specific foods or nutrients, which may do more harm than good, it’s important to concentrate on a healthy eating plan that contains all food groups, including dairy foods.

    The American Cancer Society encourages consumption of a healthy diet to help maintain a healthy weight, which is important for overall health.[5] These recommendations are consistent with the 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA) which recommends Americans 9 and older consume three daily servings of low-fat or fat-free milk and milk products every day as part a healthy eating style such as the Healthy U.S.-Style eating pattern.[6] The DGA acknowledges the role of healthy eating styles, which include low-fat and fat-free dairy foods, as being associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular disease, Type 2 diabetes, certain types of cancer and overweight and obesity.

     

    Q 4: What's the latest science regarding the relationship between dairy and cardiovascular disease?

    recent study published in The Lancet of adults from 21 countries found eating dairy foods is linked to reduced risk of major cardiovascular disease events and mortality.[7] The results of this large prospective cohort study add to the existing body of research that dates back nearly 25 years, where several studies show dairy foods are associated with a neutral or reduced risk of heart disease. The study involved more than 136,000 adults ages 35 to 70 years old across five continents who completed food frequency questionnaires to record dairy consumption of milk, cheese and yogurt and other dairy-based foods. This was further categorized into low-fat and whole-fat dairy. Why the distinction? The researchers noted they wanted to examine if dietary guidance to choose only low-fat over whole-fat dairy, due to its saturated fat content and potential adverse effects on heart health, would hold up if tested among diverse populations from low- and middle-income countries.

    The main findings include:

    • Higher consumption of total dairy (more than two servings per day compared to 0.5 servings) was associated with reduced risk of total mortality, non-cardiovascular mortality, cardiovascular disease mortality, major cardiovascular disease and stroke, while no association was observed with myocardial infarction
    • Higher milk and yogurt consumption (more than one serving per day compared to none) was associated with reduced risk of total mortality;
    • Cheese and butter (butter intake was low) consumption was not associated with risk of total mortality.

    These results are consistent with the growing body of scientific evidence that has shown eating dairy foods from a variety of fat levels are associated with neutral or reduced risk of cardiovascular disease outcomes[8] and mortality.[9] Additionally, this new evidence indicates that dietary recommendations to include dairy foods — within caloric and physical activity recommendations and regardless of fat level — as part of healthy eating patterns could be made globally.

     

    Q 5: Is dairy environmentally friendly?

    Producing dairy foods requires natural resources such as energy, land and water so food can travel through the supply chain from farm to table. The dairy community takes environmental stewardship seriously and is committed to contributing to sustainable food systems. Becoming environmentally friendly is a journey that evolves with science and new innovations and demands commitment and continuous improvement. Here’s a snapshot of what the dairy community has done, is doing and is planning to do in the future to continuously improve its environmental efforts:

    • Dairy farmers have a long legacy of environmental stewardship. Even before anyone knew what a carbon footprint was, dairy farmers have improved breeding techniques, quality animal care, specialized feeding practices and technology. As a result, each gallon of milk produced in 2007, for example, required 90 percent less land and 65 percent less water, with a 63 percent smaller carbon footprint than it did in 1944.[10]
    • Building on this legacy, the Innovation Center ― a collaboration of U.S. dairy companies, cooperatives and stakeholders ― made a shared commitment to sustainability in 2008 by creating the Sustainability Alliance. Among other things, members agreed to make dairy foods available in ways that enhance and protect our natural resources to nourish a growing population.
    • The goals of the Sustainability Alliance are grounded in sound science. Before the Alliance was formed, the Innovation Center conducted a comprehensive life cycle assessment of farms, transportation and dairy companies to measure the industry’s carbon footprint. This baseline data, published in 2007, showed that the dairy sector contributed about 2 percent of total U.S. green-house gas (GHG) emissions and used about 5 percent of total water withdrawal. Understanding the LCA allowed the dairy community to set a voluntary goal to reduce GHG emissions 25 percent from 2007 to 2020.[11]
    • Guided by research and input from stakeholders, the Innovation Center board identified three environmental priorities to address: GHG emissions, energy use and water quality and quantity. They developed and completed several projects to reduce emissions and energy use and fostered partnerships to accelerate progress toward common goals of environmental stewardship.

    Looking ahead, dairy farms and companies will continue to use the Stewardship and Sustainability Framework for U.S Dairy to set performance baselines and measure improvements on the field, on the farm and in dairy companies along the supply chain. Ongoing research will continue to advance the science and understanding of dairy’s environmental impact and help evolve best management practices.

    Of course, dairy’s environmental footprint is part of a multi-dimensional approach to achieving sustainable food systems ― it’s also about the contribution to nutrition, public health, social wellbeing, economics and thriving communities.

    For more commonly asked questions and answers about dairy, visit: https://dairygood.org/content/2016/myths.

    References:

    [1]Keast DR, Fulgoni 3rd VL, Nicklas TA, O’Neil CE. Food sources of energy and nutrients among children in the United States: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003–2006. Nutrients. 2013;5:283–301.

    [2]O’Neil CE, Keast DR, Fulgoni VL, Nicklas TA. Food sources of energy and nutrients among adults in the US: NHANES 2003–2006. Nutrients. 2012;4:2097–120.

    [3]Low-fat milk provides 366 mg potassium per cup, 8% DV (USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference Release 28 #0108)

    [4]Davoodi H, Emaeili S, Mortazavian AM. Effects of milk and milk products consumption on cancer: a review. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 2013;12:249- 264.

    [5]Kushi LH, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines on nutrition and physical activity for cancer prevention. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62:30–67.

    [6]US Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2015-2020. http://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015/guidelines/

    [7]Dehghan M, et al. Association of dairy intake with cardiovascular disease and moratlity in 21 countries from five continents (PURE): a prospective cohort study. The Lancet. 2018;392(10161):2288-2297.

    [8]Drouin-Chartier JP, et al. Comprehensive review of the impact of dairy foods and dairy fat on cardiometabolic risk. Adv Nutr. 2016;7(6):1041-1051.

    [9]Soedamah-Muthu SS, et al. Milk and dairy consumption and incidence of cardiovascular diseases and all-cause mortality: dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;93(1):158-171. 

    [10]Capper JL, Cady RA, Bauman D. The environmental impact of dairy production: 1944 compared with 2007. J Anim Sci. 2009;87(6):2160-2167.  

    [11]From Dairy Lifecycle Assessment research: https://www.usdairy.com/~/media/usd/public/dairysenvironmentalfootprintbrochure-july.pdf  

    About the Presenter: Leslie Bonci. MPH, RDN, CSSD

    Leslie Bonci is the owner of Active Eating Advice by Leslie, a nutrition consulting company and co-founder of Performance365, a sports nutrition consulting company. Leslie was a spokesperson for the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and is a sought-after industry spokesperson. She conducts media training, lectures and writes on topics such as Communicating with Conviction, Sciensationalism, and performance nutrition. Her clients include National Dairy Council, General Mills, The Wonderful Company, Gatorade, KLEAN Athlete, Bayer, Potatoes USA, The California Dried Plum Board and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.

  • Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews: Top Articles of 2018

    by Caitlin Kinser | Jan 04, 2019

    As is typical in each calendar since 2000, ACSM published four issues of Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews (ESSR) in 2018: at the beginning of January, April, July, and October. The journal publishes forward-looking content that either provides the rationale for a novel hypothesis or summarizes work on a contemporary issue and then identifies the key gaps in knowledge that need to be addressed to move the field forward. Critically, the content encompasses the 11 topical areas that comprise the foundation for the annual ACSM meeting. 

    word cloud 2018 reviewTo illustrate the scope of this content, the image (right) shows a word cloud constructed from the key words for the 32 papers that were published in 2018. The size of each word in the diagram indicates the frequency with which it was mentioned in these papers. Not surprisingly, the most frequently used key word was “exercise,” which is appropriate given the name of the journal. Note also that the key words range from the molecular to population levels of analysis.  

    The relative interest in these 32 papers can be quantified by comparing the numbers of times the online version of each paper is viewed. The online content can be viewed either through an institutional subscription to the journal (Ovid) or through the journal website itself. The most frequently viewed 2018 paper differed for the two platforms. The most popular paper through Ovid was a provocative perspective written by Mike Joyner and Carsten Lundby on the topic of maximal oxygen consumption and trainability. They challenged the findings that claim some humans are less responsive than others to training interventions designed to increase maximal oxygen consumption. The responsiveness of individuals to this specific training stimulus has public-health implications due to the association between fitness and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. They discuss the factors that can contribute to the variation in the response to training among middle-aged and older adults and suggest that another wave of twin studies is needed to resolve some of these issues.

    The most accessed paper through the journal site was written by Amanda Tyndall and colleagues and presented a novel hypothesis on the influence of exercise on cognition and brain health in older adults. The specific issue they addressed was the moderating influence of exercise on the association between declines in cognitive function with advancing age and the risk of developing Alzheimer disease and related dementias. They propose that exercise has a beneficial impact on cognitive function through multiple mechanisms that together promote healthy aging of the human brain. Their model provides the foundation for a range of studies that can disentangle the influence of specific exercise attributes on the various features of cognitive function.

    ESSR_2018 statsThe papers to be published in 2019 will continue this format of synthesizing contemporary knowledge in our field and suggesting directions for future research. The planned content will include authoritative perspectives on:

    • strategies to increase population levels of physical activity,
    • the role of physical activity in vascular insulin resistance in skeletal muscle and brain,
    • the influence of exercise on the gut microbiome,
    • blood pressure control during dynamic exercise,
    • the periodization of carbohydrate performance availability to augment sports performance, and
    • a framework for evaluating wearable sensors.

    We hope our content will continue to be of interest to you and, as always, encourage you to send us suggestions on topics and authors we should consider for inclusion in the journal.

    Most Read Articles of 2018

    Concepts About VO2max and Trainability Are Context Dependent

    Protective Effects of Exercise on Cognition and Brain Health in Older Adults *Journal Club

    The Impact of Aerobic Exercise on the Muscle Stem Cell Response *Journal Club

    Exercise and the Tumor Microenvironment: Potential Therapeutic Implications *Journal Club

    Dietary Nitrate Enhances the Contractile Properties of Human Skeletal Muscle

    Sedentary Behaviors and Adiposity in Young People *Video Abstract

    Potential Role of MicroRNA in the Anabolic Capacity of Skeletal Muscle With Aging *Video Abstract

    Identifying Novel Signaling Pathways: An Exercise Scientists Guide to Phosphoproteomics *Journal Club **Supplemental Digital Content

    Modulation of Energy Expenditure by Estrogens and Exercise in Women *Video Abstract

    The Microvasculature and Skeletal Muscle Health in Aging *Video Abstract

    Specificity of "Live High-Train Low" Altitude Training on Exercise Performance

    Exercise Is an Adjuvant to Contemporary Dystrophy Treatments

    Skeletal Muscle Function in the Oldest-Old: The Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors 

    Conversation Starters: Highest Altmetric Attention Score

     

    Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. The score is calculated based on two main sources of online attention: social media and mainstream news media. 

    Modeling Overuse Injuries in Sport as a Mechanical Fatigue Phenomenon

    Protective Effects of Exercise on Cognition and Brain Health in Older Adults *Journal Club

    Mechanical Coupling Between Muscle-Tendon Units Reduces Peak Stresses

    Resistance Exercise’s Ability to Reverse Cancer-Induced Anabolic Resistance

    Potential Roles of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor During Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy

    Dietary Nitrate Enhances the Contractile Properties of Human Skeletal Muscle

    Skeletal Muscle Function in the Oldest-Old: The Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors 

    Sedentary Behaviors and Adiposity in Young People *Video Abstract

    The Importance of mTOR Trafficking for Human Skeletal Muscle Translational Control

    Exercise and the Tumor Microenvironment *Journal Club


    ACSM Professional Members have access to both print and digital subscriptions to ESSR, as well as additional ACSM journals Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise®, Current Sports Medicine Reports(Physician Members Only) and the Translational Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine. Further, members receive discounts on ACSM certification exams, meeting and conference registrations, ACSM continuing education credits and more. Learn more and join today! 

    Roger Enoka, Ph.D.Roger M. Enoka, Ph.D., is a professor of integrative physiology at the University of Colorado Boulder.  He is the current Editor-in-Chief of Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews (ESSR).

     

  • Top 10 News Articles of 2018

    by Caitlin Kinser | Jan 02, 2019
    Each Tuesday ACSM members receive the Sports Medicine Bulletin (SMB) via email. Every edition of SMB includes links to relevant news articles that feature ACSM members, discuss research published in ACSM journals, or report on facts that are relevant to the exercise science and sports medicine industries. 

    These are the most read articles from the SMB In The News section in 2018:

    The Physiology of a Six Pack U.S. News & World Report, April 26  
    ACSM President Walt Thompson is quoted as a subject matter expert in this article.

    20 Ways to improve your health in under 20 minutes Business Insider, April 16
    Guidelines from the American College of Sports Medicine are cited in this article.

    Lift Weights, Eat More Protein, Especially is You're Over 40 The New York Times, February 7
    This article discusses research published by ACSM members.

    Even shorts bursts of exercise can reduce Americans' risk of disease and death, study says ABC News, March 25 
    ACSM President-elect, Bill Kraus, M.D., is interviewed as the subject matter expert for this article.

    Ranked: The 25 Unhealthiest Cities in America Newsweek, September 26
    This article is based on results of ACSM’s 2018 American Fitness Index and includes a quote from ACSM Past President, Honorary Fellow and Current Chair of the ACSM American Fitness Index Advisory Board Barbara Ainsworth. Ph.D., M.P.H., FACSM.

    This is How Many Squats it Takes to See Results Reader's Digest, August 7
    ACSM exercise physiologist and personal trainer Jim White is quoted in the article as a subject matter expert.

    Underdosing, Overdosing, and Structural Barriers -- Exercise is Medicine Population Health, August 8 
    This article features research by ACSM member and fellow Ben Levine.

    If you're interested in receiving SMB each week, you can learn more about becoming an ACSM member here


  • Top 10 Active Voice Articles of 2018

    by Caitlin Kinser | Dec 27, 2018

    Each Tuesday ACSM members receive the Sports Medicine Bulletin (SMB) via email. Every edition of SMB includes an Active Voice article that is written by a researcher or subject matter expert and is dedicated to sharing the latest news on important research and relevant topics to the exercise science and sports medicine community. 

    Introducing, the top 10 most read Active Voice articles from 2018: 

     

    1. Q&A – Updated Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Released by Katrina L. Piercy, Ph.D., R.D., ACSM-CEP® on November 13, 2018. 

    2. Does Caffeine Enhance Tolerance to High-Intensity Exercise? by Adriano E. Lima-Silva, Ph.D., and Romulo Bertuzzi, Ph.D. on May 1, 2018. 

    3. A Novel Therapeutic Exercise Mode for Managing Knee Osteoarthritis by Hamilton Roschel, Ph.D. on July 31, 2018. 

    4. HIIT in the Real World – Effective, but Not for Everyone? by Melyssa Roy, MBChB, MMSc on November 27, 2018.

    5. Resistance Training and the Nervous System by James L. Nuzzo, Ph.D., CSCS®, and Janet L. Taylor, M.D. on February 6, 2018. 

    6. Exercise Training Modifies Our Gut Bacteria by Jacob Allen, Ph.D., and Jeff Woods, Ph.D., FACSM on July 3, 2018. 

    7. Physical Activity for Healthy Aging: The Intensity Matters for Combating Chronic Inflammation in Older Adults by Andreas Nilsson, M.P.H., Ph.D. on October 9, 2018. 

    8. Cardiometabolic Impact of Changing Sitting, Standing and Stepping in the Workplace by Elisabeth A.H. Winkler, Ph.D., and Genevieve N. Healy, Ph.D. on June 19, 2018. 

    9. ACSM’s New Exercise Preparticipation Screening - Removing Barriers to Initiating Exercise by Gary Liguori, Ph.D., FACSM, Meir Magal, Ph.D., FACSM, and Deborah Riebe, Ph.D., FACSM on January 16, 2018. 

    10. Does Estrogen Modulate Physical Activity in Women? by Edward L. Melanson, Ph.D., FACSM, and Wendy M. Kohrt, Ph.D., FACSM on October 16, 2018. 


    Viewpoints presented in SMB commentaries reflect opinions of the authors and do not necessarily reflect positions or policies of ACSM. 

  • Industry Presented Blog | Protein Myths vs Facts: More Truths About Protein for the Active Individual

    by David Barr | Dec 20, 2018

    Clif ACSM Active FAQ



    Clif Bar & Company recently hosted an industry-presented webinar where Dr. Mike Ormsbee dispelled common myths about protein and discussed the latest research and recommendations on the amount, type and timing of protein needed to maintain overall health, improve body composition and maximize exercise performance. Watch a free recorded version of the webinar. The webinar is also available for two (2) CECs via ACSM ceOnline.

    Several questions were asked by attendees during the webinar. This post serves as an extension to the Q&A portion of the webinar – providing answers to questions that were asked but were left unanswered due to time constraints.

    1. Are proteins from animal or plant sources better for active individuals?

      Both sources provide high-quality protein that meet the needs of active people. However, animal- and plant-based protein sources differ in their amino acid profiles. Animal proteins and soy protein are considered complete proteins because they contain all nine of the essential amino acids necessary for protein synthesis. Most plant-based proteins are considered incomplete proteins and may not contain one or two essential amino acids. Studies show that greater amounts of plant-based proteins need to be ingested compared to animal proteins to achieve the same level of muscle protein synthesis.1,2 In the end, both types will meet overall protein needs and have varying health benefits. There are a variety of factors that impact protein selection (e.g., quality, taste and environmental impact), so it’s recommended to consume a variety of sources to optimize protein synthesis, particularly for those choosing more or all plant-based options.

       

    2. I have heard that higher-protein diets increase calcium excretion; will eating above the RDA in protein damage my bones?

      No, eating protein will not damage your bones. In fact, the evidence shows that increased protein intake is associated with increased bone mineral density when calcium intake from your diet is normal. One study found that even during an energy deficit (when you eat fewer calories than you burn), protein intake did not affect urinary calcium excretion.3 The National Osteoporosis Foundation concludes that higher protein intakes have no adverse effects on bones and may even benefit bone density.4

       

    3. Can increased protein intake affect kidney function?

      In healthy individuals who do not have kidney disease, protein intake will not harm kidney function. There is also no evidence that a higher-protein diet will influence kidney function. In protein overfeeding studies that lasted for up to one year, there were no reported changes in kidney function.5 Furthermore, a recent meta-analysis that pooled all the available data on this topic concluded that higher-protein diets had no influence on kidney function (glomerular filtration rate) in adults without kidney disease.6

       

    4. What resources can help me determine how much protein my clients need (and ways they can achieve this amount) based on their level of activity?
      The Active Nutrition Guide is a comprehensive resource for health professionals working with a wide range of active people. The guide helps explain the role of food in fueling healthy, active bodies. All active people benefit from nutrition that considers their fitness goals and is personalized to the day-to-day intensity, frequency and duration of their activity. Using the guide, you can develop custom nutrition plans to best support the changing energy and nutrient needs of each day. The guide includes sample performance meal patterns – examples that showcase how the nutrition recommendations translate into real-life meal patterns across various activity scenarios in four popular sports- running, triathlon, mountain biking and cycling. The Active Nutrition Guide is also accompanied by a series of modules that provide activity-specific nutrition advice from spots nutrition experts, alongside real-world tips from athletes. Currently, modules are available for running, cycling and soccer, with more to come in the future.

       

    5. How do endurance cardio exercise events impact net protein breakdown? Should protein requirements remain at 1.6-2.0 g/kg/d?
      Intense or prolonged activity causes an increase in muscle protein breakdown, which is typically followed by an increase in muscle protein synthesis over the next 24 hours. The consumption of high-quality protein during this period enhances this process – accelerating the recovery process and stimulating skeletal muscle growth. While 1.6-2.0 g/kg/d should be used as the base recommendation on days with prolonged cardio exercise, additional protein can be added to the diet post-exercise to improve recovery. The recommended amount of protein consumed after exercise increases as the duration of exercise increases. For exercise lasting 90-120 minutes, add 0.275 g/kg post-activity. For exercise lasting 120-240+, add 0.3 g/kg post-activity. On average, this equates to approximately 25-40 grams of protein post-workout, depending on body weight and duration of activity. Refer to the Active Nutrition Guide for additional recommendations.

    As more people aspire to lead a more active lifestyle, the role of protein in your meal pattern is becoming increasingly important. Refer to the Active Nutrition Guide and webinar for more evidence-based facts on protein and personalized nutrition recommendations.

    References:

    1. Hoffman, J. R. & Falvo, M. J. (2004). Protein – which is best? J Sports Sci Med 3: 118-130.
    2. Babault, N. et al (2015). Pea proteins oral supplementation promotes muscle thickness gains during resistance training: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trail vs. whey protein. J Int Soc Sports Nutr 12:3.
    3. Cao, J. J. et al. (2014). Calcium homeostasis and bone metabolic responses to high-protein diets during energy deficit in healthy young adults: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 99: 400-407.
    4. Shams-White, M.M. et al. (2017). Dietary protein and bone health: a systematic review and meta-analysis from the National Osteoporosis Foundation. Am J Clin Nutr 105(6): 1528-1543.
    5. Antonio, J. et al. (2016). A high protein diet has no harmful effects: A one-year crossover study in resistance-trained males. J Nutr Metab 2016: 9104792.
    6. Devries, M.C. et al. (2018). Changes in kidney function do not differ between health adults consuming higher- compared to lower- or normal-protein diets: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nutr 148: 1760-1775.

    About the Author: Dr Mike Ormsbee
    Mike Ormsbee, PhD, FACSM, FISSN, CSCS*D is the Associate Director of the Institute of Sports Sciences and Medicine and an associate professor in the Department of Nutrition, Food and Exercise Sciences at Florida State University. From his days as an NCAA collegiate ice hockey player, to competing in 70.3 Ironman races, to helping others achieve their performance goals, he has always used evidence-focused training and nutrition strategies to optimize performance and body composition. As a member of the Clif Bar & Company Nutrition Advisory Council, he uses his nutrition and sport science expertise to support Clif’s commitment to providing sustainable, nutritious food for athletes and active people.

     

    About Clif Bar & Company: Clif Bar & Company crafts nutritious and organic food to feed and inspire adventure, including CLIF BAR® energy bars; CLIF Kid® energy snacks and LUNA® nutrition bars. Family and employee-owned, the company is committed to sustaining its people, brands, business, community and the planet.

...121122123124125126127128129130...