ACSM Blog
Menu

In This Section:

  • ACSM’s New Consensus Statement on Sex Differences in Athletic Performance

    by Greg Margason | Sep 29, 2023
    SDACSM has released a new pronouncement, “The Biological Basis of Sex Differences in Athletic Performance: A Consensus Statement for the American College of Sports Medicine,” published in ACSM’s Translational Journal of Sports Medicine.

    What does that mean?

    First, let’s talk about what ACSM pronouncements are, then about the specific type of pronouncement this is, which will give us insight into how and why it was developed.  

    ACSM pronouncements are official statements demonstrating the organization’s stance or position on a particular subject, for which ACSM’s Pronouncements Committee screens and selects a team of experts to research said subject and author a subsequent pronouncement. Then, (a) the pronouncement is rigorously reviewed by the Pronouncements Committee, (b) the ACSM journal the pronouncement is to be published in administers several rounds of external peer review, and (c) the ACSM Administrative Council and Board of Trustees grant final approval. 

    Such pronouncements come in a number of distinct forms, all with their own unique development and review processes: position stands, umbrella reviews, expert consensus statements, contemporary issues, and calls to action. You can learn more about each of these pronouncement types on the ACSM website.  

    This current pronouncement is an ACSM Expert Consensus Statement. These statements represent a combination of the available evidence on a particular subject and, as the name suggests, a consensus of expert opinion. ACSM reserves such pronouncements for subjects of high importance or wide-ranging impact. However, these pronouncements do not necessarily indicate policy recommendations. 

    “The Biological Basis of Sex Differences in Athletic Performance: A Consensus Statement for the American College of Sports Medicine” aims, as the name likewise conveys, to share the most up-to-date knowledge available and an expert consensus about the biological reasons behind sex differences in athletic performance — particularly as athletic governing bodies debate policies regarding the inclusion of transgender athletes in cross-sex competition. This latter point is important to ACSM because the organization is dedicated to encouraging safe physical activity and sports participation for all people. Again, however, the statement’s purpose is not to make policy recommendations but rather survey the field to see what information might be available for, or necessary to include in, such a discussion. 

    What does this statement include? 

    The Biological Basis of Sex Differences in Athletic Performance Thumbnail_FINALThe statement’s findings show that differences in performance between males and females are largely driven by males’ far greater production of testosterone beginning at puberty — roughly 12 years of age. In fact, by age 18, males on average have 15 times more testosterone in their bodies than females. Thus, adult males are faster, stronger and produce more power than females of approximately the same age and training. In athletic events that showcase or otherwise require aerobic capacity or muscle power, males outperform females by 10-30%. (Though this consensus statement does briefly cover some of the biological differences in children, its focus is almost entirely on adults.)  

    The statement’s authors also note, however, that there is far less evidence about athletic performance in adult females than one might expect or, rather, hope for. Historically, and even today, much of the field has focused on the exercise physiology and performance of males, and more research centered on females could provide much-needed, actionable data from this relatively neglected population. The implications for the health and performance of female athletes could be profound, even beyond athletic competition. Such research would also be particularly timely as females enter, in increasing numbers, traditionally male professions that require physical prowess, including the military, law enforcement and firefighting. 

    Regarding transgender issues, ACSM plans to publish two further pronouncements on the subject, “Clinical Care (health/performance) Issues of Transgender Athletes” and “Call to Action on the Need for More Research.” Both of these papers are currently in development. 

    The authors point out that there are still many gaps in the current research regarding sex differences in athletic performance. They note particular opportunities for studies examining exercise performance and adaptations related to short- and long-term exercise, as well as exploration of different training and rehabilitation modalities for males and females. 

    For additional resources on the consensus statement, please visit acsm.org/sd


    Correction Note (Published 10/6/23)

    The Consensus Statement Writing Group has corrected two errors identified in the original pronouncement published on Sept. 29. Both errors were found in the same statement in Box 1: Definitions.

    Original Statement

    Two percent of humans are intersex, harboring both male and female reproductive organs, and are reproductively fertile.

    Corrected Statement

    Differences/disorders of sex development (DSD) are rare conditions in which the development of chromosomal, gonadal, and anatomic sex is atypical (outside the binary of male/female).

    Rationale for Corrections

    This statement erroneously shared that “Two percent of humans are intersex..” The two percent figure represents the broadest range of conditions characterized by genital, reproductive, hormonal or sex chromosome differences, and includes many conditions that are not widely considered to be classified as DSD/intersex traits. The prevalence is much lower with narrower definitions of DSD/intersex. As a result, the two percent figure has been removed, the phrase corrected and the language is now consistent with the original corresponding sentence in the consensus statement itself (See page 19, under the heading “Hormonal Disorders (PCOS, DSD)”).

    Additionally, the sentence incorrectly stated that individuals with DSD are “reproductively fertile.” Because some with DSD do experience infertility, the phrase was removed completely.

    The Translational Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine will release an errata as soon as possible in order to ensure the published record is as accurate as possible.

    Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise will incorporate the corrected language into the final version of the consensus statement, which will appear in its December 2023 issue. 

  • ACSM Supports REACH Program Funding

    by Greg Margason | Sep 27, 2023

    Policy CornerForty-one organizations received funding to implement CDC’s Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health (REACH) program. In the five-year program, the recipients will put into action evidence-based strategies. to improve health, prevent chronic diseases, and reduce health disparities among racial and ethnic populations with the highest risk, or burden, of chronic disease. ACSM is proud to support the funding of this program. 

  • ACSM Hot Topic | Prostate Cancer: A Survivor’s Perspective

    by Greg Margason | Sep 27, 2023

    HT Prostate CancerSeptember is Prostate Cancer Awareness Month, and for men living in the U.S., one in eight will be diagnosed with the disease at some point, including more than 200,000 this year. If you are an African American man, the likelihood is one in five, and if you have a family history of prostate cancer, the odds are even higher at one in three. 

    As one of the nearly 3 million men in the U.S. who counts himself as a prostate cancer survivor, as well as a clinical exercise physiologist, I write to promote greater awareness of this disease and to share a few aspects of my personal experience. 

    Prevention 

    Importantly, the primary lifestyle factors — dietary and physical activity habits — are effective for both prevention and preventing recurrence of prostate cancer. These, of course, fall squarely in our domain as physical activity experts and fitness and medical professionals, and it’s important that we educate the public about them. You may find this recent study, published in Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise®, of interest. 

    In my case, my healthy lifestyle did not prevent prostate cancer; however, it helped make for a reasonably short recovery, and my periodic prostate specific antigen (PSA) checks (more on this in a minute) have remained undetectable. 

    Misconceptions and key questions 

    Before I go into the details of my personal experience, it may be important to address a few key questions about prostate cancer. 

    Is prostate cancer an “old man’s disease”? Although age is a risk factor, only six cases in ten are diagnosed in men over 65 years old; approximately 10% of diagnoses are made in men younger than 55. Thus, thinking of prostate cancer as an “old man’s disease” is not entirely accurate. More of our patients, fitness clients or colleagues may be affected by this disease than we would imagine. 

    Who should be screened and when? The screening recommendations have changed over time. Interestingly, the ~50% decline in the death rate from prostate cancer between 1993 to 2013 was likely due to earlier detection (as well as improvements in treatments). Age, race (African American), and family history are the key factors that influence the decision about who to screen and when to start screening. The American Cancer Society provides guidance on making informed decisions. It might seem like an awkward conversation to have with patients, clients, family or friends, but spreading the word about prostate cancer screening can be a lifesaving act. 

    What tests are used for screening? In the U.S., screening is most commonly via a blood test for prostate specific antigen (PSA) and a digital rectal exam done in a physician’s office. Like all medical tests, the accuracy of the tests are not perfect, as possibilities of false positives or negatives may occur. Recently, additional options (blood, urine, or imaging [MRI] tests) have emerged which may aid individuals in making decisions. If findings from these tests are positive, the next step is considering a prostate biopsy. If cancer is found on a biopsy sample, the next decision is about treatment. 

    The treatment decision will be based on each individual’s characteristics, with particular emphasis being placed on age, comorbidities, stage/grade of cancer, and the possible side effects of the treatment options. The three primary options are active surveillance, radiation therapy (with or without hormone therapy), or radical prostatectomy (complete removal of the prostate). 

    My personal experience 

    In my case, as a white man with no family history of the disease, I started having prostate cancer screening (PSA and digital rectal exam) at age 55 at my annual medical exam. After many years of normal results, I had a notable jump in my PSA level and my doctor recommended a biopsy. That’s when I got the call with the news “You have prostate cancer.” 

    I immediately started investigating the different treatment options and sought a second opinion from a urologist specializing in prostate cancer and also sought the opinion of a radiation oncologist. Additionally, I sought information from various medical research centers. I was able to enroll in a clinical trial investigating the role of a positron emission tomography (PET) scan, using a radiopharmaceutical agent that recognizes prostate-specific membrane antigen in guiding surgery. As importantly, I talked with many other men who had previously been diagnosed to learn about their treatment decisions. I came away from all this information gathering with an understanding that each case is unique. Fortunately, having a range of treatment options, each with supportive data, allows men good options. My advice, if you receive the news “you have prostate cancer,” is to gather all the information you can so you can make the best choice for you. 

    I encourage you to do a web search for Prostate Cancer Awareness Month to access resources available from numerous organizations to learn more about prostate cancer. Please support prostate cancer awareness by promoting this in both your workplace and community. 

    Lenny KaminskyDr. Lenny Kaminsky directed the Clinical Exercise Physiology Program and Laboratory and the Adult Physical Fitness Program at Ball State University (BSU) for over 25 years and is currently he is the Director Emeritus of BSU’s Fisher Institute of Health and Well-Being. He is one of the primary collaborators of the Ball State Longitudinal Lifestyle Study (BALLST) and one of the co-founders of the Fitness Registry for the Importance of Exercise National Database (FRIEND) Registry for Cardiorespiratory Fitness. He has served as editor of multiple American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) publications and regularly contributes to scientific writing groups including the American Heart Association’s Scientific Statement supporting Cardiorespiratory Fitness as a Vital Sign and the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation’s (AACVPR) Statement on Progression of Exercise Training.  He is the Editor-in-Chief of AACVPR’s Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention and the Commentary Editor of the ACSM Bulletin. 

  • A Fitness Professional’s Introductory Guide to Assessing Static Posture: Part II

    by Greg Margason | Sep 22, 2023
    Static posture II

    In the first part of this blog series, we discussed the importance of performing a static postural assessment with your clients, athletes, and patients. This second article introduces the basic static postural assessment and demonstrates how to spot common postural deviations, likely driven by muscular imbalances, that may lead to acute and/or chronic musculoskeletal conditions and pain.

    As stated in the first part of this series, the three most common postural distortion syndromes are a) pes planus/pronation distortion syndrome, b) lower crossed syndrome, and c) upper crossed syndrome. For the scope of this article, we will only cover how to assess clients’ static posture for these three postural distortion syndromes. However, fitness professionals should be aware that clients may exhibit other static postural deviations (e.g., kyphotic-lordotic posture, flat-back posture, sway-back posture, genu/knee varus or bowed legs, etc.).

    When assessing clients’ static posture from the anterior and lateral views, fitness professionals can assess each of the body’s five kinetic chain checkpoints: foot/ankle, knees, lumbopelvic hip complex, shoulder complex, and head/neck. In this article, we will focus on assessing clients from the anterior view for signs of pes planus/pronation distortion syndrome and from the lateral view for signs of lower crossed syndrome and upper crossed syndrome.

    Pes Planus/Pronation Distortion Syndrome

    fig1-4From the anterior view, have the client remove their shoes, then line them up to the plumb line (if available), a line on the wall, or an imaginary vertical line with their feet approximately shoulder width apart. The line should lie halfway between their feet and be aligned with their pubis (Figure 1). When assessing the foot, the toes should be pointed straight ahead and the feet should have a normal medial longitudinal arch (i.e., not too high of an arch and not too low of an arch or flat feet) (Figure 2). The client’s knees (i.e., patella) should be facing straight ahead, and the patella should be approximately in line with the client’s second or third toe.

    Clients with pes planus/pronation distortion syndrome, also known as a flexible foot, will exhibit overpronation of the foot where the medial longitudinal arch has fallen and flattened and the forefoot may align slightly outward, which is a sign of a combination of excessive foot eversion and forefoot abduction (Figure 3). With this foot posture, the toes will point slightly outward as opposed to straight ahead. It is then common for clients with pes planus/pronation distortion syndrome to exhibit slight internal rotation of the lower leg (i.e., tibia and fibula) with their knees then being positioned more medially in the frontal plane (i.e., knock-kneed) and their patella possibly pointing slightly inward (Figure 4). The medial displacement of the client’s knees in the frontal plane is known as knee valgus or knee abduction due to the outward angle of the tibia on the distal femur. Therefore, the client’s knees will not line up with their second or third toes but rather their great toe or possibly even more medial to the great toe (Figure 4). Please note that knee valgus is more commonly witnessed in female clients due to their wider pelvic structure and increased quadriceps or Q-angle.

    Pes planus/pronation distortion syndrome has been correlated with acute injuries like ankle sprains, calf strains, and knee injuries (e.g., ACL and MCL tears and medial meniscus pathologies) as well as chronic musculoskeletal conditions, such as patellofemoral pain syndrome, anterior and posterior tibialis pathologies, Achilles tendinopathy, plantar fasciitis, hallux valgus (i.e., bunions), and even low back pathologies.  

    Please note that a static postural assessment is just the beginning of a comprehensive health and fitness assessment. When clients perform dynamic postural assessments, such as the overhead squat assessment, single-leg squat assessment, and gait assessment, signs of pes planus/pronation distortion syndrome will become much more apparent. Therefore, you should only note the presence of pes planus/pronation distortion syndrome if it is obvious in a static standing position.

    Lower Crossed Syndrome

    Fig5-6To assess clients for signs of lower crossed syndrome, the fitness professional must assess the client from a lateral view. The plumb bob at the bottom of the plumb line (if used), should line up just anteriorly to the client’s lateral malleolus. Ideally, the plumb line, line in the wall, or imaginary line should be slightly anterior to the middle of the knee joint, slightly posterior or in line with the hip joint, midway through the shoulder joint, and in line with the external auditory meatus of the ear (Figure 5).

    During a static postural assessment, lower crossed syndrome is characterized by the knee possibly being in a hyperextended position, the hip joint flexed, the pelvis in an excessive anterior pelvic tilt, and the lumbar spine in excessive extension or lordosis (Figure 6). It is important to note that asymptomatic individuals have been shown to have a natural anterior pelvic tilt where their posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) of the ilium is slightly higher than their anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS). This slight anterior pelvic tilt allows humans to have a natural inward curve in their lumbar spine, i.e., lordosis. However, if you perceive an excessive anterior pelvic tilt and lordosis, you should note this within your client’s health and fitness assessment datasheet.

    Lower crossed syndrome has been primarily correlated with low back pathologies. However, it is not uncommon for a client to exhibit both lower crossed syndrome and pes planus/pronation distortion syndrome. The combination of these two postural distortion syndromes may increase the likelihood of both pain and the musculoskeletal conditions previously mentioned, as well as acute injuries like strained hamstrings or hip adductors. As previously mentioned, when clients perform dynamic postural assessments, such as the overhead squat assessment, gait assessment, and upper body pushing and pulling assessments, signs of lower crossed syndrome will become much more apparent. Therefore, you should only note the presence of lower crossed syndrome if it is obvious in a static standing position.

    Upper Crossed Syndrome

    Fig7-8From the lateral view, with an ideal static posture of the thoracic spine, shoulder complex (i.e., shoulder girdle and shoulder joint), and head/neck region, the plumb line, line in the wall, or imaginary line should lie midway through the shoulder joint and be in line with the external auditory meatus of the ear (Figure 7).

    Clients with upper crossed syndrome will commonly exhibit an excessive kyphotic curve in their thoracic spine, rounded or protracted scapulae with the shoulder joint falling anterior to the line, possibly internally rotated shoulder joints (i.e., arms falling forward and palms of the hands facing backward), and/or the external auditory meatus of the ear lining up anterior to the line, which as often referred to as forward head (Figure 8). Note that some clients may exhibit all of the signs of upper crossed syndrome mentioned above, while other clients may only exhibit one sign (e.g., the client has a normal alignment of the thoracic spine and shoulder complex but exhibits a forward head posture). Therefore, it’s important to make detailed notes in your client’s health and fitness assessment datasheet.

    Upper crossed syndrome has been associated with numerous musculoskeletal conditions, specifically chronic conditions. Due to excessive kyphosis and rounded and internally rotated shoulders, clients with upper crossed syndrome may be at risk for conditions such as shoulder impingement, rotator cuff pathologies, biceps tendonitis, and shoulder joint instability. A forward head posture may lead to mid- to upper-back pain, neck pain, thoracic outlet syndrome, temporomandibular disorders, and tension headaches. As previously noted, further dynamic postural assessments may exacerbate signs of upper crossed syndrome. Therefore, the fitness professional should only note the presence of upper crossed syndrome if it is obvious in a static standing position.

    Putting All the Pieces Together

    Although assessing a client’s static posture is just the beginning of a comprehensive assessment of the human body, it is a key element of a health and fitness assessment. A static postural assessment will assist you in detecting possible muscular imbalances and in developing an individualized exercise program for your client aimed at decreasing the risk of injury and improving performance. For a comprehensive list of static postural deviations and muscular imbalances associated with these deviations, please refer to this resource.  

    Related content: 
    Blog | A Fitness Professional’s Introductory Guide to Assessing Static Posture: Part I

    Related CEC Courses:
    Using Posture to Enhance Movement (1 CEC)
    Anatomy of Movement (5 CECs)

    Ryan Fairall
    Ryan R. Fairall, Ph.D., ACSM-EP, EIM, CSCS
    , is an assistant professor of exercise science at Catawba College in Salisbury, N.C. He has worked in the fields of health/fitness and sports since the year 2000, has been a certified personal trainer since 2003, and has been an instructor in higher education since 2015. In his free time, Ryan enjoys being physically active — lifting weights, playing sports, kayaking, fishing, going on walks with his female Shih Tzu, Bledsoe, and watching his hometown Philadelphia sports teams, which can be very frustrating at times.

  • Traditional vs. Roth IRA: Which Is Better for Sports Medicine Professionals?

    by Greg Margason | Sep 22, 2023
    IRAs

    Ever found yourself painfully stuck between two choices? Having an internal debate, weighing each option over and over? You think, “It’s only been a few minutes, right?” And then you look at your phone. It’s 3 a.m. Great.

    I’ve been there. Many times.

    If you’re a sports medicine pro, you’ve probably juggled countless decisions, from treatment plans to rehab routines. But here’s the real kicker: Choosing between a traditional IRA and a Roth IRA can be just as vital as any game-time decision.

    But don’t worry. As a financial advisor in this industry, I know the financial ups and downs you face, and I’ve walked many clients through this exact same crossroads.

    Both of these retirement savings vehicles have their merits and can play a significant role in helping to ensure your financial stability down the road. However, the choice between them isn’t always straightforward. After you’ve had a read through this article, you won’t just be wading in the dark when it comes to traditional and Roth IRAs. Nope — you’ll have a clear picture of how each one works and how it can play into your life. You’ll be more confident in making a choice that matches your goals and sets you on the right path.

    Traditional IRA: Tax-Deferred Savings

    Let’s start with the traditional IRA. This retirement savings option has been a go-to choice for many professionals over the years, and it offers several key advantages that may appeal to sports medicine professionals.

    Tax Deductions Today, Taxes Tomorrow

    One of the primary benefits of a traditional IRA is its immediate tax advantage. When you contribute to a traditional IRA, your contributions are typically tax deductible in the year you make them. This means you can reduce your taxable income, potentially lowering your tax bill for the year in which you contribute. For sports medicine professionals who have a higher income, this upfront tax deduction can be a significant perk.

    Tax-Deferred Growth

    Another advantage of a traditional IRA is that your investments within the account can grow tax deferred. This means you won’t pay taxes on any earnings or capital gains generated by your investments until you withdraw the money in retirement. This tax deferral can allow your investments to compound and grow more quickly over time, potentially resulting in a larger nest egg when you retire.

    Consider for High Earners

    If you earn a substantial income, a traditional IRA can be a valuable tool for reducing your current tax liability. The ability to deduct your contributions can result in a lower tax bill, freeing up more money to invest or spend as you see fit. Plus, since there are no income limits for contributing to a traditional IRA, high-earning professionals can take full advantage of this tax benefit.

    Now, let’s talk about a Roth IRA.

    Roth IRA: Tax-Free Distributions

    The standout feature of a Roth IRA is that qualified withdrawals in retirement aren’t taxed as income. This means that when you retire and start tapping into your Roth IRA, you won’t owe income taxes on the money you withdraw, including any investment gains. This can be a significant perk.

    No Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs)

    Another noteworthy benefit of the Roth IRA is that it’s not subject to required minimum distributions (RMDs) during your lifetime. With a traditional IRA, the IRS mandates that you start taking withdrawals once you reach a certain age (currently 72), whether you need the money or not. This can be a drawback for those who would prefer to leave their retirement savings untouched for as long as possible. With a Roth IRA, you have the flexibility to let your investments continue growing income tax free without being forced to take distributions.

    Flexible Contributions

    Roth IRAs also offer flexibility when it comes to contributions. While there are income limits that determine how much you can contribute to a Roth IRA each year, these limits are higher than many people realize. Sports medicine professionals with varying income levels can often find a way to contribute to a Roth IRA, either directly or through a backdoor Roth strategy. This flexibility can be a valuable asset in your retirement planning tool kit.

    Which Option Is Better for Sports Medicine Professionals?

    Now that we’ve examined the key features of both traditional and Roth IRAs, you might be wondering which is the better choice for sports medicine professionals. The truth is, there’s no one-size-fits-all answer. The decision between a traditional and Roth IRA depends on your individual financial situation, goals and tax considerations. Let’s break it down further:

    Traditional IRA for Sports Medicine Professionals:

    • Tax Deductions. If you’re looking to lower your current tax bill, a traditional IRA’s immediate tax deduction can be a powerful tool, especially if you’re in a high income bracket.
    • Tax-Deferred Growth. The ability to grow your investments tax deferred can lead to more significant growth over time, potentially resulting in a larger retirement nest egg.
    • Consider for High Earners. Sports medicine professionals with higher incomes can fully leverage the tax benefits of a traditional IRA, as there are no income limits for contributions.

    Roth IRA for Sports Medicine Professionals:

    • Income Tax-Free Distributions: If you anticipate needing tax-free income in retirement, a Roth IRA offers this benefit, which can be particularly appealing if you’re concerned about future tax rates.
    • No RMDs: The absence of required minimum distributions allows your investments to continue growing income tax-free for as long as you like, providing greater flexibility in retirement planning.
    • Flexible Contributions: Roth IRAs offer options for contributions that can accommodate a range of income levels, making them accessible to many sports medicine professionals.

    Next Steps

    1. Current Tax Bracket: Assess your current tax bracket. If you’re in a higher tax bracket now and anticipate being in a lower one during retirement, a traditional IRA’s upfront tax deduction may make sense.
    1. Anticipated Retirement Tax Bracket: On the other hand, if you expect to be in a higher tax bracket in retirement or are concerned about future tax rates, a Roth IRA’s income tax-free withdrawals can be advantageous.
    1. Long-term Goals: Consider your long-term financial goals. If you want to leave a tax-efficient inheritance for your heirs or maximize your wealth transfer, a Roth IRA’s absence of RMDs might be a key factor.
    1. Diversification: Many sports medicine professionals choose to hedge their bets by contributing to both a traditional and a Roth IRA, allowing for a mix of taxable and tax-free income in retirement.
    1. Seek Professional Guidance: Finally, it’s essential to consult with a tax professional and a financial advisor who specializes in serving sports medicine professionals. They can help you navigate the complexities of tax planning, retirement savings and investment strategies tailored to your unique needs and goals.

    The choice between a traditional and Roth IRA isn’t a one-size-fits-all decision. Both options offer distinct advantages, and the best choice for you depends on your specific financial situation and long-term goals. To make an informed decision, consider your current and anticipated tax brackets, your retirement goals, and the benefits each type of IRA offers. A financial advisor with experience in serving sports medicine professionals can provide invaluable guidance in aligning your retirement savings strategy with your career and lifestyle. Ultimately, the path you choose will play a crucial role in shaping your financial future, so take the time to make an informed choice that best suits your needs.

    Related content: 
    Blog | The Pros and Cons of Hiring a Financial Advisor for Sports Medicine Professionals

    Jason Korzan
    Jason Korzan 
    is based in Atlanta, GA and runs a financial advisory practice associated with Consolidated Planning. Having dedicated a significant portion of his professional life to assisting multimillion dollar manufacturing companies in financial management, he decided to turn his attention to his genuine passion: helping families organize, protect, and focus their financial resources. As a former collegiate baseball player, coach, and lifelong athlete, Jason focuses his practice on delivering tailored financial solutions to sports medicine professionals, helping them achieve financial fitness alongside their physical endeavors.

    Registered Representative and Financial Advisor of Park Avenue Securities LLC (PAS). OSJ: 6115 PARK SOUTH DRIVE, SUITE 200, CHARLOTTE NC, 28210, 704-5528507. Securities products and advisory services offered through PAS, member FINRA, SIPC. Financial Representative of The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America® (Guardian), New York, NY. PAS is a wholly owned subsidiary of Guardian. Consolidated Planning, Inc. is not an affiliate or subsidiary of PAS or Guardian. CA Insurance License Number - 4318264.

    Guardian, its subsidiaries, agents and employees do not provide tax, legal, or accounting advice. Consult your tax, legal, or accounting professional regarding your individual situation. The information provided is based on our general understanding of the subject matter discussed and is for informational purposes only. This material is intended for general use. By providing this content Park Avenue Securities LLC and your financial representative are not undertaking to provide investment advice or make a recommendation for a specific individual or situation, or to otherwise act in a fiduciary capacity. 2023-160458 Exp. 8/25

     

...11121314151617181920...