ACSM Blog
Menu

In This Section:

  • 2022 ACSM Annual Meeting Highlighted Sessions in Immunology, Genetics and Endocrinology

    by Caitlin Kinser | May 02, 2022

     

    DNA strand in gold and black
    2022 Annual Meeting
    It is my pleasure to serve as the ACSM topical representative for Immunology, Genetics, and Endocrinology. The 2022 ACSM Annual Meeting will feature several outstanding sessions on the interactions between hormones, immunology and genetics with exercise and disease across the lifespan. There are three sessions that I think will be of particular interest to conference attendees. The first is a highlighted symposium entitled, “Genetics of Musculoskeletal Disease.” This important session is scheduled for June 1st (Wednesday) from 9:30 -11:30 a.m. The symposium will be chaired by Vanessa Sherk, Ph.D., and features three exceptional speakers who are making their debut at the ACSM Annual Meeting: Cheryl Ackert-Bicknell, Ph.D., Struan Grant, Ph.D., and Charles Farber, Ph.D. This session will discuss recently discovered genetic targets related to rare and common muscle and bone diseases that are also influenced by exercise (e.g., osteoporosis), and will provide important insights into some of the experimental approaches used to study these areas. 

    The second symposium I would like to highlight is entitled, “The Wu Tsai Human Performance Alliance- Addressing the Sex and Gender Gaps in Sports Performance Research.” This session is scheduled for June 3rd (Friday) from 9:30 -11:30 a.m., will be Chaired by Kathryn Ackerman, M.D., FACSM, and features four outstanding presenters: Louise Burke, Ph.D., FACSM; Kirsty Elliot-Sale, Ph.D.; Trent Stellingwerff, Ph.D., FACSM; and Emily Kraus, M.D. Topics will include guidelines for assessing effects of the menstrual cycle on performance, considerations for studying exercise in pregnancy, best practices for undertaking nutrition research in female athletes, important sports science questions for the menopausal athlete and unique approaches to dissemination of findings to the broader community. 

    The final symposium that I would like to highlight is entitled, “HERITAGE Family Study at 25: Summary of Training Effects on Fitness, Reproducibility, Genomics and Molecular Transducers,” and features four experts related to the HERITAGE study. The session is scheduled for June 3th (Saturday) from 9:00-11:00 a.m. Speakers include, Mark Sarzynski, Ph.D., FACSM; Jacob Barber, Ph.D; Sujoy Ghosh, Ph.D; Jeremy Robbins, M.D. The goal of this symposium is to summarize some of the findings of HERITAGE and their potential implications for cardiometabolic health and cardiorespiratory fitness. 

    In addition to these sessions there will a Tutorial Session on “Keeping Pace with Advances in Exercise Genetics” on June 2nd (Thursday), at 10:40 a.m., a thematic poster session on “Rodent Studies Combining Immunotherapy and Exercise to Treat Cancer” on June 2nd (Thursday), at 3:45 p.m., oral sessions “Genetic Regulators and Responses to Exercise” on June 1st (Wednesday), at 3:15 p.m. and “Immune and Inflammation and Exercise” on June 3rd(Friday), at 1:30 p.m. and poster sessions spread throughout the week.  

    Learn more about additional sessions in Immunology, Genetics and Endocrinology and the many other sessions that will be presented at the 2022 ACSM Annual Meeting. 

    Vanessa Sherk, Ph.D., is an assistant professor at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus. She is the ACSM Annual Meeting Program Committee topical rep for immunology, genetics and endocrinology. 

  • How Does Exercise Improve Immune Bioenergetics?

    by Greg Margason | May 02, 2022

    How Does Exercise Improve Immune BioenergeticsNatural killer (NK) cells, which are found in the blood, are crucial in the prevention and treatment of cancer. They function by eliminating malignant tumors in an innate immune manner. NK cells express an array of activating and inhibitory receptors that recognize cancer cells without the need for immunization. Cytotoxicity is a process that results in damaging or destroying cells. The antitumor cytotoxicity of NK cells depends on their ability to recognize cancer cells and produce cytotoxic proteins. Mitochondrial bioenergetics is essential for optimizing NK cell effector functions, including increased cytotoxic potential and cytokine production.

    Regular exercise reduces mortality associated with most cancers. An acute bout of exercise mobilizes NK cells that enter the bloodstream from peripheral tissues; it can modulate the antitumor cytotoxicity of NK cells by altering cellular protein contents in an intensity-dependent manner. However, patients with malignancies experience gradual declines in muscle strength and cardiorespiratory fitness, which can influence their ability to exercise. This may lead to a more sedentary lifestyle. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) has been shown to be a more effective modality for improving cardiorespiratory fitness than moderate-intensity continuous training in both healthy individuals and patients with cardiovascular disease.

    Our study, published in the May issue of Medicine & Science in Sport & Exercise®, involved 60 sedentary males who were randomly assigned to engage in either HIIT or moderate-intensity continuous training, or were assigned to a control group that did not receive exercise intervention. We observed that HIIT was superior to moderate-intensity training for enhancing exercise performance by increasing peak pulmonary ventilation and work-rate. Notably, both types of exercise training improved two cytotoxic characteristics of NK cells that involved the increases in cytotoxic proteins expressions and proliferative capacity of NK cells in the blood. Moreover, the two exercise regimens effectively elevated membrane potential and depressed cell matrix oxidant burden in the mitochondria of NK cells. This was associated with an increased oxygen uptake efficiency in NK cells.

    NK cells are also important antiviral white blood cells that can rapidly respond to pathogens before an adaptive immune response occurs. Clinical studies in patients with COVID-19 have shown decreased NK numbers and function, resulting in decreased clearance of infected cells and increased tissue inflammation. Our previous and present studies indicate that moderate-intensity exercise training downregulated the senescent and inhibitory receptors on NK cells, thereby increasing clonal expansion and simultaneously improving NK cells’ ability to recognize and take cytotoxic action against viruses and cancer cells.

    Our experimental findings could help determine effective exercise regimens for simultaneously improving cardiorespiratory fitness and the bioenergetic efficiency of NK cells in people living a sedentary lifestyle.

    Jong-Shyan Wang
    Jong-Shyan Wang, Ph.D.
    , is a professor at the Graduate Institute of Rehabilitation Science at Chang Gung University, Taiwan. Dr. Wang was included in Stanford University Names World’s Top 2% of Scientists in 2021. His research focuses on developing exercise prescriptions for inflammatory/immunity, thrombotic and cardiovascular disorders.


    Disclosure: This work was supported by the National Science Council of Taiwan and the Chang Gung Medical Research Program.

    Viewpoints presented in SMB commentaries reflect opinions of the authors and do not necessarily represent ACSM positions or policies. Active Voice authors who have received financial or other considerations from a commercial entity associated with their topic must disclose such relationships at the time they accept an invitation to write for SMB.

  • Henry Ford Health Reimbursement Case Study

    by Greg Margason | Apr 27, 2022
    Henry Ford Health Reimbursement Case StudyThe Preventive Cardiology department at Henry Ford Health in Detroit, Michigan, employs 18 clinical exercise physiologists (CEPs) across three sites, as well as two registered dieticians (RDs); there are no other allied health professionals on staff. 

    The Henry Ford Health CEPs provide a wide variety of services: 

    • Adult weight management — counseling patients on physical activity, nutrition (in conjunction with an RD) and adherence to meal plans. 
    • Bariatrics — working with patients prior to their surgery to help them understand the role that physical activity plays in weight maintenance. 
    • Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) — providing traditional, facility-based CR, including Phase 3 as well as telehealth CR. 
    • Cardiopulmonary stress testing — CEPs prepare patients and monitor vital signs during testing. CEPs with a master’s degree or higher supervise testing under the direction of a physician who is located in the immediate vicinity. 
    • Exercise oncology — working with patients who have a cancer diagnosis and may or may not be actively receiving treatment. 
    • Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) — providing supervised exercise training and risk-factor reduction education to patients with symptomatic PAD. 
    • Research — supporting clinical trials where exercise is either being used as an intervention for a chronic disease or where changes in exercise capacity are an expected outcome. 

    For all of these categories, the CEP documents the service provided (e.g., CR with continuous ECG monitoring, in the electronic medical record [EMR]). Where appropriate, the CEP will also enter a charge that generates a billing claim using the health system’s National Provider Identifier (NPI) number. The health system then receives reimbursement for the services rendered from third-party payers with whom it has a contractual agreement. At no time does an individual CEP or RD use their own NPI number to submit claims for direct reimbursement from a third-party payer; all claims are made on behalf of the facility.

    There are some programs for which a contractual agreement for reimbursement is either entirely unavailable or unavailable from certain payers. Specifically, the adult weight management program is not covered by all payers. Patients wishing to take part in the program without insurance coverage are asked to self-pay. All of the Phase 3 participants are self-pay. The work done in the bariatric program is considered part of a diagnosis-related group where all services provided as part of a procedure are included in a lump-sum reimbursement to the facility. The exercise oncology program is predominately grant funded, with participants asked only to make a small, token payment to encourage patient buy-in. Lastly, the CEPs involved in research have their salary covered by the clinical trial they are supporting equivalent to the amount of time spent on that trial, i.e., if they spend 50% of their time supporting a specific trial, that trial covers 50% of their salary.

    The current group of billing codes that are in widespread use for services delivered by CEPs (i.e., cardiac rehabilitation, exercise stress testing, etc.) describe services provided by a facility, not an individual. Therefore, the facility NPI number is used on claims submissions. The purpose behind a CEP obtaining an NPI number is to facilitate ACSM in determining how many CEPs are currently employed by health care systems in the United States. This information is and will be used by third-party payors when evaluating new billing codes for reimbursement purposes. It would make little sense to decide to provide a service to beneficiaries only to discover later that there is a shortage of qualified providers. Obtaining an NPI now is an important and necessary step towards increasing opportunities for CEPs in the future. 

    Robert Berry
    Robert Berry, MS, ACSM-CEP
    , is a Master’s prepared Clinical Exercise Physiologist (CEP) earning his graduate degree in Health Promotion and Education from the University of Pittsburgh in 1999. He obtained his ACSM-CEP certification in 1999 and his ACSM-RCEP certification in 2005. Robert has over 20 years’ experience in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and is the Clinical Coordinator of Cardiac Rehabilitation for Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit, Michigan where he designed and implemented the first telehealth CR program in the United States to be reimbursed by a third party payer.

  • 2022 ACSM Annual Meeting Highlighted Sessions in Fitness Assessment, Exercise Training and Performance

    by Caitlin Kinser | Apr 25, 2022

    Fitness Assessment, Exercise Training and PerformanceThe Fitness Assessment, Exercise Training and Performance topic area covers the broadest array of topics in the fields of exercise science and sports medicine, and we have presentations for everyone from researchers, academics and practitioners to fitness professionals, educators and students. We have focused on including more international experts and female-related topics and perspectives in 2022. As always, our topic area covers all ages and fitness levels as well as some more focused information about specific sports & activities.  

    We are excited to present our Highlighted Symposium, both in person and virtually, “Out to Pasture or Let it Ride: Determining the Fate of Fitness Testing in Youth” on Thursday, June 2nd, 9:30-11:30 a.m. Speakers will include Leah Robinson, Ph.D., FACSM, “Evolution of Youth Fitness Testing”; Dawn P. Coe, Ph.D., FACSM, “Has Youth Fitness Testing Been Misguided?”; Shannon Siegel, Ph.D., FACSM, “Pros and Cons of Youth Fitness Testing” and Rebecca A. Battista, Ph.D., FACSM, “Youth Fitness Testing: What Should the Goal Be and How Should We Achieve It?” This Symposium, chaired by Karin A. Pfeiffer, Ph.D., FACSM will highlight the pros and cons and future directions of fitness testing in terms of health, development and participation in physical activity and sport of youth.  

    We have also planned a diverse range of tutorial lectures on using biomarkers for exercise and nutrition programming (Shawn Arent, Ph.D., FACSM); exercise variability and response (Robert Ross, Ph.D.) and resistance and power training in dancers (Barry Parker, Ph.D., and Jessica Sansone, Ph.D.) and older adults (Anoop T. Balachandran, Ph.D.), respectively. Free Communications, rapid fire and thematic poster sessions provide a wonderful opportunity to see several presentations in an area of interest while also getting to hear from and interact with the presenters in a meaningful environment. This year’s thematic poster sessions will include Running and Fitness Assessment. The rapid-fire session will be a dynamic presentation on Blood Flow Restriction Training. Our traditional slide presentations will focus on this year’s theme of Women in Sport. 

    We don’t want to be sedentary for too long, so feel free to take activity breaks during regular sessions and remember that the poster hall allows for more opportunity to move around. As usual, there are a multitude of traditional poster sessions on the above topics as well as body composition; cognitive function; blood flow restriction; cardiovascular, resistance & interval training; military/service personnel; recovery; running; soccer; fitness testing; COVID-19 and women-specific research and training. With so many abstracts and interest in this topic area, there are related posters at every single poster session time, every day of the conference! 

    We look forward to you joining us at the 2022 ACSM Annual Meeting in San Diego to learn more about fitness assessment, training and performance. Recommendations to maximize your experience include making sure to review the entire program as there are related sessions listed under various categories including a summary of training effects from the HERITAGE study (Genetics) and physical fitness in pregnancy (Athlete Care); and keep on the lookout for additional virtual content. For all our ACSM Certified professionals you can ensure you are employing the most current evidence-based practices as well as earn your CEUs to maintain your certifications. Not certified? You can learn more about ACSM certification there, too.  
    Safe travels!

    Register for the ACSM 2022 Annual Meeting

    Melissa Wehnert Roti, PhD, FACSM, ACSM-EP, ACSM-GEI, and Kimberly Reich, Ph.D., ACSM-EP, EIM-II

  • High Intensity Physical Activity in Individuals with Elevated Levels of Coronary Artery Calcium Appears to Be Safe

    by Greg Margason | Apr 25, 2022
    High Intensity Physical Activity in Individuals with Elevated Levels of Coronary Artery Calcium Appears to Be Safe

    The 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans notes that there is no obvious “best amount” of physical activity and no evidence of increased risk, even among those that engage in high intensity activities. However, vigorous physical activity may acutely increase the risk of heart attack and sudden cardiac death in some individuals. Recent studies have shown that large volumes of high intensity physical activity may actually have maladaptive cardiovascular effects, including accelerated rates of cardiac scarring, atrial fibrillation and coronary artery calcium (CAC).

    CAC is a highly specific subclinical marker of coronary atherosclerosis and is strongly associated with risk of future cardiovascular disease events, such as heart attack. The higher the CAC, the higher the risk. Traditionally, risk factors for the development of CAC (and heart disease) include high blood pressure, high cholesterol, diabetes and smoking, among others. However, the participants in the studies showing the link between high amounts of physical activity and CAC did not possess these traditional risk factors, leading to the controversial hypothesis that high levels of physical activity may actually increase CAC and subsequent risk of heart disease in otherwise healthy individuals.

    In our study, published in the May 2022 issue of Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise®, we used data from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) to better understand the relationship between physical activity, CAC and cardiovascular outcomes. MESA is a large and ongoing population-based cohort study of men and women in the United States. This cohort was ideal because it has baseline information on CAC and physical activity with roughly 15 years of follow-up data. MESA includes participants from four different racial/ethnic groups (defined as “White,” “Black,” “Chinese” and “Hispanic”), making the results of our study more broadly applicable. Physical activity was assessed via a questionnaire during the baseline exam. The physical activity data was transformed into quartiles of MET-minutes (the amount of calories expended during one minute of rest) per week, with the lowest quartile serving as the reference group for the purposes of the analyses. Computed tomography scans were done to quantify CAC, and scores were dichotomized as “low CAC” (CAC < 100) and “high CAC” (CAC ≥ 100), which correspond with low and high risk, respectively. Outcomes assessed included mortality and cardiovascular disease, defined as a composite of myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, definite or probably angina, fatal coronary heart disease, fatal and nonfatal stroke, other atherosclerotic death, or other cardiovascular death.

    We found that participants with low CAC that engaged in the highest quartile of physical activity had a reduced risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality. Participants with high CAC that engaged in the highest quartile of physical activity had a reduced risk of mortality, and no increased risk of cardiovascular disease. In fact, high levels of physical activity were not associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease or mortality regardless of CAC, sex or race/ethnicity. Importantly, these results were established even after controlling for traditional risk factors.

    While this study suggests that high amounts of physical activity appear to be safe, even among those at high risk, it was conducted in an observational cohort. Future studies should be done to confirm these data. Additionally, we were unable to account for differences in physical activity levels over time. However, our results should empower patients to be physically active and encourage health care providers to promote physical activity and exercise, even among those at high risk of cardiovascular disease. 

    Charles German
    Charles A. German, M.D., M.S., is an assistant professor and preventive cardiologist at the University of Chicago. He is the current director of cardiac rehabilitation and serves on the editorial board of the Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention. He also serves on the physical activity committee and obesity committee for the American Heart Association. His research interests focus on accelerometry-based physical activity; relationships between physical activity, sleep, and sedentary behavior; and the safety of physical activity in high risk populations. He can be reached at cagerman@uchicago.edu or on Twitter @DrGermanMD.

    Viewpoints presented in SMB commentaries reflect opinions of the authors and do not necessarily represent ACSM positions or policies. Active Voice authors who have received financial or other considerations from a commercial entity associated with their topic must disclose such relationships at the time they accept an invitation to write for SMB.

...41424344454647484950...