ACSM Blog
Menu

In This Section:

  • Mentored to Success: A Story from ACSM's Leadership & Diversity Training Program

    by Caitlin Kinser | Nov 25, 2019

    ACSM 2019 - Me, David, Ipek, Andrea - Diversity ReceptionOur mentoring story began in 2010 when David Garcia (second from left in image) was completing his master’s degree at the University of Pittsburgh and was accepted into the ACSM Leadership and Diversity Training Program (LDTP). The LDTP encourages ACSM members from underrepresented minority groups in the sciences to participate in activities that will lead to increased ACSM service and leadership, enhanced pathways to degree completion and successful mentored experiences. Through the LDTP, David was paired with ACSM Fellow Stella Volpe, Ph.D., RD, LDN, FACSM (far left in image), a professor and chair of the Department of Nutrition Sciences at Drexel University. It was Stella’s first match since volunteering to be a mentor.

    David: In our first meeting, a few things about Stella became very apparent. First, everyone knows STELLAAAAA (insert the movie quote). Second, she is the kindest person you will ever meet. For anyone who has met Stella, you know she will always greet you with a smile, hug and friendly conversation. Finally, she loves dogs, and it just so happens that my initials are D.O.G. Needless to say, our mentor/protégé relationship was meant to be, and we became known as “Stella and DOG.”

    Stella: Over the course of the next six years, I mentored David as my protégé. He came to know the “ins and outs” of ACSM leadership roles and responsibilities. More importantly, as his mentor I helped him see the value of enjoying what you do, developing a strong work ethic and staying humble. In six years together, David achieved many personal and career milestones. He got married and had two children, a boy named Mateo and a girl named Stella (not a coincidence). He completed his Master of Science and Ph.D. degrees, completed a post-doctoral fellowship and became an assistant professor at the University of Arizona. He published in the areas of dog ownership and physical activity, while I served as co-author on these publications. David also earned ACSM Fellowship status, ultimately achieving one of the main goals of the LDTP.

    David: As I was writing this blog, I took time to reflect on my experiences as an LDTP protégé. I have so many fond memories. First and foremost, I think of the wonderful network of mentors and colleagues that I have had the opportunity to interact with over the past nine years. Not only has Stella been there for me, but Drs. NiCole Keith and David Marquez have also been instrumental in my professional development. In addition, my fellow LDTP protégés (Dr. Susan Aguiñaga, Dr. Eduardo Bustamante, Dr. Mario Muñoz and many more) served as constant sources of support and guidance. And of course, there is the ACSM staff, especially Chris Sawyer, who supports the mission of the LDTP and serves as an advocate for all of us.

    I also think of the countless hours and discussions with Stella about my career goals. To this day I still seek her advice and guidance. I have benefited greatly from my experiences with the LDTP “family” – this is ultimately what we are, and it is with my deepest gratitude that I am part of it. Please consider donating to the ACSM Foundation’s Diversity and Mentorship fund. Help others find their STELLAAAAA…

    Stella: When reading David’s words, I smiled and cried, because it is very touching and means a lot to me. Although I was the “mentor” in this wonderful ACSM LDTP partnership, I learned a lot from David, and also felt blessed to be his mentor. David is right. We have had a lot of phone calls through our six years as an LDTP protégé-mentor pair or, as David wrote, “Stella and DOG!”

    When David asks me for advice and guidance now, it makes me happy to know that he wants my support and opinions. The ACSM LDTP is a wonderful program, and it has allowed me to get to know more people at ACSM, which is another blessing! In addition, I presently have another LDTP protégé, Dr. Andrea Duran, and she and David have become friends. David has also provided her with some mentorship and even become an official LDTP mentor himself, which means that this program will continue to be robust! A big thanks to Chris Sawyer from ACSM, and to all who work so hard to keep this program strong! 


  • Industry-Presented Webinar Q&A | Secrets to Enhancing Shoulder Strength and Function

    by David Barr | Nov 21, 2019

    FMS Shoulder Webinar

    Functional Movement Systems (FMS) and ACSM recently hosted an industry-presented webinar with Lee Burton, PhD, ATC, entitled Secrets to Enhancing Shoulder Strength and Function. This is Part I of the Q&A.

    ACSM FMS Webinar series Shoulder

    Watch the full webinar here

    Read Part II of the Q&A here.
    Several questions were asked by attendees during the webinar and the answers pertaining to instability, dysfunction, and more are below.


    Q: What's your go-to exercise/stretch for shoulder health for any client and why?

    The initial focus should be to improve thoracic/mid-back mobility instead of stretching the shoulder. A lack of mobility in this area commonly leads to problems in the shoulder. A side-lying rotation can be a good activity, lying on your side with the top leg pulled toward your belly, placing the knee on the ground. From there grab your ribs with your top hand between the ground and ribs and pull your ribs and torso around creating rotation. Do this without allowing your top knee to come off the ground.

     

    Q: Are there any assessments that exist that will help detect weak areas in the upper body?

    Initially it is best to perform tests/screens that will give you an overall idea of weakness in the upper body and not try to pinpoint a specific area/muscle. Performing an extended or flexed arm hang for time as well as grip strength testing will give you a good gauge of upper body strength. There is plenty of research data that can be accessed on the internet which should give you an idea of normative values to compare. In our system we look at the push-up and upper body motor control, which is a single arm plank with a reach, we have found these tests to be useful since they also give us some information on core stability.

     

    Q: In your opinion what is the best exercise to stabilize the shoulder blades?

    Based on the concept of regional interdependence it is best to understand or determine what is causing the instability in the shoulder blades. Many times, the instability in the shoulder blades can be caused by a lack of mobility in the mid-back so improving mobility here will help with overall shoulder blade stability. You first need to ensure you have good postural control so performing farmer’s walks for time with good postural integrity is a good activity as well as push-ups with a focus placed on the press at the top to create scapulae protraction.

     

    Q: Would you avoid recommending shoulder exercises such as the overhead press in a client with a mild thoracic scoliosis?

    If you are prescribing good mobility activities to help with the scoliosis, then performing forward or horizontal presses would be a good start. Standing or half-kneeling with one-arm forward presses would be good to also improve core stability and allow you to focus on the weaker side. One-arm overhead presses would be more beneficial for the same reason if the client can maintain good posture integrity while going overhead. A Turkish get-up is also an option to work them into good posture and getting the arm overhead.

     

    Q: Does that mean that if someone has a shoulder dysfunction it could affect one's breathing?

    Yes, the data suggest that poor shoulder mobility and breathing are related. This is mainly because of the way we typically test shoulder mobility, which is many times created by a lack of mid-back mobility, rounded shoulders, etc.  

     

    Q: How specifically does grip strength associate with upper and lower body strength? Wouldn’t a rock climber or power lifter have stronger grip by their sport-specific demand whereas grip is less of a factor in say basketball?

    There is a lot of research data that suggest that grip strength is related to overall strength. This, in my opinion, relates more to activity level. 

     

    Q: Exercise professionals (e.g., personal trainers) are not licensed health care providers (e.g., physical therapists, chiropractors, medical doctors). Certainly, exercise has therapeutic benefits and exercise is medicine. Where do you draw the line with regard to scope of practice for exercise professionals and corrective treatment and when working with clients who are experiencing pain and musculoskeletal dysfunction?

    Great questions and ones we all as professionals need to work together in order to create a more clear idea of where the line is and how we can all help each other. In my opinion, if a person is currently experiencing pain they should at least have a medical diagnosis. They can certainly exercise if they are having pain; however, there are certainly some activities that should be avoided which the medical professional could/should provide. Since this is such a difficult thing to clearly define the best advice is to create some lines of communication between the exercise and medical professionals.

     

    Q: What's happening in the body, and how do we fix it when there is significant forward flexion in the upper body (not necessarily in the spine, but at the hips) while squatting?

    There could be many problems. It is difficult to point to one thing without having other movements to view. The reason we look at seven patterns is exactly for this reason. We need to have an overall profile of different movements in order to make a better recommendation.

     

    Q: Would FMS assessments be recommended for use with obese populations?

    Yes, however, start with the easier movements such as the shoulder, leg raise, and don’t make too many assumptions as to what the person can/can’t do. The idea is to simply set a baseline of what can and can’t be done. If none of the movements can be performed that is OK. You can then shift to improving fundamental mobility and body weight activities and then go back and recheck the patient.  

     

    Q: Fascinating information. What would you recommend for a person with slightly left scoliosis with a flat and tight thoracic spine? Also, this person can’t do any overhead movements without pain that also occurs in the base of neck.

    Start on the ground with crawling, quadruped rotations, etc. focus on the tighter side. Working toward Turkish Get-ups which will have the body work itself under the arm which is a great way to get the arm overhead.

     

    Q: Do you think there is ever a scenario where actively training external/internal rotation, for example, is necessary? As opposed to just stability/anti-rotation, such as in the realm of physical therapy.

    I don’t believe it is necessary unless there is a medical problem with the shoulder/rotator cuff. Focus more on stability activities such as deadlifts and farmer’s walks which are better activities for stability.

     

    Q: What about exercises such as Ts and Xs to improve posture?

    These would be good supplemental activities.

     

    Q: A group fitness setting presents its own unique challenges as individuals come and go often without regularity. How would you approach individuals with poor movement skills in a group fitness setting and address these poor movement qualities?

    This is a difficult situation; however, ideally you could try and perform some type of screening or assessment prior to beginning the group fitness session. My best recommendation is to at least keep an eye on individuals who breakdown during the session and try giving them some ideas of alternatives or things they can do on their own.

     

    Q: So, what were the "secrets of shoulder function?" It seemed like just a brief and vague FMS description.

    Grasping an understanding of regional interdependence, knowing that shoulder function is directly dependent upon other areas of the body working correctly. Before you start shoulder activities ensure that they have good mobility in the mid-back/T-spine, check breathing and work on stability through push-ups, quadruped activities and deadlifts.

     

    Q: In your experience, how long does it take to improve an individual's trunk stability push-up? When is it more "strength" than stability/motor control?

    This is really dependent upon the age, behavior and activity level of the individual. What other aspects of their lifestyle could/should be considered? If it is truly a strength problem, then most data say 4 to 6 weeks of strength training to have strength gains.


    Presenter:
    Lee Burton FMS
    Dr. Lee Burton has an extensive background in sports medicine and strength and conditioning. He currently consults with a wide variety of professional sports organizations as well as leading health and fitness facilities on injury prevention and performance enhancement.  He lectures both nationally and internationally on various topics in the fields of sports medicine and strength and conditioning. Dr. Burton is a Certified Athletic Trainer, Certified Strength and Conditioning Specialist and one of the founding owners of Functional Movement Systems.


    View More Popular FMS Content

    ACSM FMS CEC Course
    CEC Course | FMS - Move Well then Move Often


    FMS Shoulder Webinar QnA
    Secrets to Enhancing Shoulder Strength and Function Q&A Part I

  • Protein Power | CEC Course

    by David Barr | Nov 20, 2019

    Protein Power Course ACSM

     

    Nancy Rodriguez, PhD, RD, FACSM aims to clear up misinformation about protein while presenting current recommendations, trends, and research examining the impact of quantity and quality on various health outcomes and the planet.

    About the course:

    This course includes an online video from ACSM’s Health & Fitness Summit and a corresponding online quiz. All course content will be presented to you electronically upon completion of your purchase. This includes all videos, quizzes, and certificates (certificates awarded upon successful completion of the quizzes).

    Available ACSM CECs 3.0


    Learning objectives for the course - Power of Protein: Quality and Quantity in Healthy Eating Patterns and Sustainable Food Systems:

    • Provide an overview of current protein research/recommendations, including new perspectives related to specific health outcomes including weight management, exercise recovery/performance, and healthy aging.
    • Address concerns regarding protein consumption on bone, renal and other health outcomes.
    • Translate the latest scientific findings on the role of protein quantity, quality, timing/meal distribution, and environmental impact into practical tips and suggestions for a variety of different clients that optimize consumption within the context of healthy eating patterns and a sustainable food system.

    Purchase and earn CECs


    Earn More CECs Through Popular Courses


    ACSM CEC Course Intelligence
    Multiple Intelligence Theory | CEC Course


    Nutrition Quiz ACSM
    Nutrition Spotlight | CEC Bundle


    Nutrient Timing Course
    Nutrient Timing | CEC Course


    How to Coach the Squat ACSM
    How To Coach the Squat | CEC Video Premiere

  • Strategies for Staying Fit During Parenthood | Fit Feature

    by David Barr | Nov 19, 2019

    Staying Fit During Parenthood ACSM

    Simple strategies to help encourage and support PA in parents and caregivers.

    We added a new family member to our household this fall, a wonderful corgi puppy named “Dash.” He has turned our daily routines upside down and added endless excitement to our household. The time and energy it takes to consistently train Dash to sit, stay, walk, and stop using your hand as a chew toy is fun and at times exhausting. Fitting in physical activity is definitely not as easy as it used to be! It requires lots of extra planning and a reprioritization of our time. We’re very thankful to have friends and students that help us tire him out so we can get some work done.

    Fit Feature Parenthood Fitness ACSM

    Find strategic times when the entire family can be involved in fitness



    We all have to adapt to things in our lives that challenge our workout routines. It’s important to get creative as new responsibilities come into your life like puppies, newborns, or new work opportunities. For instance, set a family goal or challenge related to health and fitness. We have a daily push-up and pull-up goal that we interchange. We can do it anytime when we’re at home whether we’re cooking or doing laundry! A quick dose of exercise is a great option to help stay physically active.


    Health & Fitness Professionals: Physical Activity Promotors

    For health & fitness professionals working with clients that are parents or caregivers here are a few things to consider while encouraging physical activity (PA)!

    • Promote autonomy! What do they like/want to do?
    • Create a list of PA exercises to do anywhere, anytime
    • Short, PA breakouts count
    • Set small goals
    • Make PA fun, consider using games or competitions 

    Learn more by reading the full article “Strategies to Support Physical Activity for Parents and Caregivers of Young Children" in the November/December 2019 issue of ACSM’s Health & Fitness Journal®. In the article, Kristi King and colleagues provide great strategies and important information to help encourage and support PA in parents and caregivers.

    November 2019 Fit Cover ACSM
    Become an Alliance Member
     or Student Member to access the full ACSM's Health & Fitness Journal® library 


    Article based on: 
    King KM, Hartson K, Della, L. Effective strategies to increase physical activity in the working years ACSMs Health Fit J. 2019; 23 (6):63-7

    Author:

    Vanessa Kercher PhD
    Vanessa M. Kercher, Ph.D., SSC, M.Ed., BESS, is a Clinical Assistant Professor in the Kinesiology Department for the School of Public Health at Indiana University. Dr. Kercher's research passion focuses on helping individuals optimize their physical activity experiences to promote sustainable, positive health behaviors. She serves as the digital editor of ACSM’s Health & Fitness Journal®. 

    Read more Fit Features by Dr. Vanessa

    Client Burnout Fix ACSM
    Burnout: Thriving or Just Surviving?


    Opportunities to Move ACSM
    Strategies to Increase Activity at Home and Work

  • Physical Activity for the Prevention and Treatment of Cancer | Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans 2nd Edition

    by Caitlin Kinser | Nov 18, 2019

    physical activity guidelines for cancer blogWorldwide, more than 18 million people develop a new cancer each year, and more than 9.5 million die of the disease. There is increasing evidence that a physically active lifestyle reduces the risk of developing several types of cancer and may also promote longer survival in people living with cancer.

    In 2018, the U.S. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee reviewed the state of science on physical activity and cancer in human population studies. After considering data from 45 systematic reviews, meta-analyses and pooled analyses, as well as original reports, the Committee found strong evidence that regular physical activity significantly reduces risk of bladder, breast, colon, endometrial, esophageal adenocarcinoma, kidney and stomach cancers. The relative risk reduction ranged from 10 to 20 percent for those who engaged in the highest versus lowest levels of activity. The committee found moderate or lower evidence that risk of other cancers was also reduced with physical activity.

    Recently, we published a manuscript in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise that updated and confirmed the Committee findings. The Committee also investigated what levels of physical activity give optimal protection against cancer. While we discovered that many reports found a greater reduction in risk with increasing amount of time exercised or higher intensity of exercise (i.e., a dose-response effect), we could not determine exact levels that provide given levels of effect. However, we found that almost any level of physical activity likely confers some benefit in reducing cancer risk. Since the epidemiologic literature we reviewed focused almost exclusively on aerobic activity, the Committee’s conclusions pertain only to this type of physical activity.

    The effects of physical activity on reducing cancer risk were seen in both women and men, although the magnitude of the relationships varied by sex for some cancers. The evidence suggested that physical activity protects against cancer in diverse race/ethnic groups, but data were limited for Blacks and Asians, and sparse for Latino, Native American and Pacific Islander populations. For some cancers, the role of physical activity on cancer risk was more pronounced in persons of normal weight compared to those with obesity.

    The Committee also investigated whether physical activity can prolong survival or reduce recurrence and new cancers among those living with cancer. We concluded that there was moderate or limited evidence that high levels of physical activity reduce risk of deaths in persons living with breast, colorectal or prostate cancers.

    The Committee identified future research needs, including epidemiologic studies of the associations of physical activity on risk for less common cancers; more studies in diverse age, racial, ethnic and socioeconomic groups; investigations of dose-response relationships; identifying ideal levels of activity for protecting against cancer; and studies of diverse types of physical activity. We identified need for randomized controlled clinical trials testing effects of different types and doses of exercise on cancer biomarkers and on prognosis in persons with cancer. Given the increasing length of survival in many cancers, the Committee also identified need for long-term follow-up of cancer survivors to determine effects of exercise on cancer progression and mortality.

    While a physically active lifestyle reduces risk for several cancers, some recreational and professional sports may increase exposure to cancer-causing agents. Examples include unprotected sun exposure, talcum powder products, air pollution, smokeless tobacco, some muscle-building products, some synthetic turf materials and alcohol use. Individuals should avoid these potential carcinogens as much as possible; there are no data on whether physical activity can attenuate the effects of these carcinogens on risk for specific cancers.

    Recently, an ACSM roundtable came to similar conclusions as did our Committee, and importantly, developed guidelines for clinicians to ensure that cancer patients and survivors benefit from physical activity to improve their health and quality of life. The roundtable concluded that exercise testing and training were generally safe for cancer survivors, and that survivors should avoid inactivity. It stated that specific doses of aerobic, resistance and combined exercise programs could help with common cancer-related health outcomes including symptoms of anxiety, depression and fatigue, and could improve physical functioning and health-related quality of life. The guidelines follow the ACSM Exercise is Medicine approach, and recommend that oncology clinicians: assess, advise, and refer cancer survivors to exercise. ACSM provides a service to oncologists and survivors with an online directory of exercise specialists who work with cancer survivors.

    In summary, the 2018 U.S. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee identified the critical role of physical activity in reducing risk for cancer and for improving prognosis in persons living with cancer. ACSM provides leadership and support to promoting physical activity for all persons and can extend the Exercise is Medicine model to preventing and treating cancer.


    Learn more about the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans, 2nd Edition

     

    Anne McTiernanAnne McTiernan, MD, PhD, FACSM, is an Internist and Epidemiologist, and is a Member of the Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, and Research Professor, Schools of Public Health and Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. Her research focuses on physical activity, diet, obesity and risk for cancer development and prognosis. Dr. McTiernan served on the 2008 and 2018 U.S. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committees. Dr. McTiernan presented the Joseph B. Wolffe Memorial Lecture at the 2018 ACSM Annual Meeting.

...919293949596979899100...